It's ok, Filly - I'd already concluded your previous pic was as banal as it first seemed. No need to rub yourself in. It's embarrassing.
No, DA. You posted a video and gave no indication as to the the reason of why you'd posted it apart from the usual cryptic heading. You then ran away. Didn't you often barrate a certain poster for linking to videos without an explanation of their thoughts on it? Even though they were relevant to the ongoing debate? Maybe I could present text in an irregular fashion to try and appear all nonchalant? I was wrong. I was only joking, guys. Haha, you absolute tool, you.
No, I have never berated anyone for posting interesting and thought-provoking videos, only banal pics like wot Filly has done. It hardly matters what my original reasons were - even tho' I did explain them in due course. Even armed with that extra info, you have 'let slip' big time what I have always believed about you; the innate bigotry, cynicism and bias. It's a giant yuck, Longs. And no surprise whatsoever. ...shudder...
By Jove. You really are flapping now. Watch out, you could unintentionally cause someone an injury with all this rabid flappiness. We wouldn't want that now would we? What would the neighbours think?
I'm really confused now. I thought Sabs were on the Foxes side. So why have a poster that's says "IT'S OVER, FOX" ???
I love it when DA starts a thread centred around bigotry, cynicism and bias, and then accuses every else of bigotry, cynicism and bias. What a man.
Haha. Please, please stop, haha, stop it, he he. Jesus-h-Christ. That is the best. Breath..... Right. Can we get this straight? Are you being serious when you say that your bigoted opinion of me has been proven by your biased cynicism?
Don't fall for it, Filly. He may plead ignorance, or the ' I was only joking card' when he's been backed into a corner and is desperate for a way out. Sly as a fox is our, DA. Don't believe his lies!
Lets keep it simple then, because you and longs both missed the point of the question. What you said, was just what was in your mind (closed, not open). No thought, though I specifically said to think before replying. I dont know if the people in the picture were in the video, do you? The picture is possibly a statement of intent. Right or wrong is a viewpoint. However, the video, was not intent was it. It was unreasonable force, aggression and violence. I dont think that is such an open viewpoint, do you? Either you support the rule of law or you support vigilantes. In this case the farmer appears to be the law breaker, but you both support him. Which proves you have no idea of the difference between the picture and the video, just a pre made up mind. Kangaroo justice I believe longs called it
Filly, your words, not mine. If you cant understand the difference between the picture and the video yet. If you can't understand that, you are, by any definition, stupid.