My post about the BBC forcing their naff dancing programme down our throats already has been deleted. We can comment about perceived failures in democracy but say a bad word about something that some people enjoy as entertainment whilst others believe it to be yet more waste by a profligate organisation with their heads in the clouds and you're sanctioned.
A posting from some fuddy-duddy complaining about vulgarities in the lyrics of a song that was playing in a Screwfix shop was also removed yesterday; so censorship seems to include anything the moderators feel at any given moment in time.
Really cheesed off with this forum and so called moderators, 2 post deleted yesterday to which I had contributed, 1. Vulgarities, 2. Strictly Dancing, the forum has become pathetic, now finally decided to delete myself.
Yep I noticed the post about vulgar song lyrics in SF had dissapeared A good few years ago I popped into my local co- op where they have music playing across the store I was rather surprised when the non radio edit version of ‘You Sexy MF’ by Prince came out the speakers - the whole track was played from start to finish Obviously not a good thing in a supermarket but it did make me snigger
Don't go Astro...or at least give me your email...lol I have been trying to highlight this Free Speech and PC debacle for some time. An example is that the BBC has failed to report this event in Sweden.( I wonder why ?) Those 'Swedes' are just getting out of hand.( total sarcasm mode initiated) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rk-rampage-Sweden.html?ito=video_player_click RS
One of the reasons why many topics get deleted (I disagree with it) is that there is a relentless effort by some to steer every topic around to suit a political agenda. Such as this. While you were on your little break things on the forum in my opinion improved greatly. Now you are back with your cynical, acid filled contributions its an immediate return to the same old churn of topic steering and goading.
The topic (not my topic) is called "strictly censored" which alludes to censorship (or if you prefer 'Bias'.) So, referring to a current news item and the BBC (British BIASED Corporation) failing to cover it....is deemed by you to be "acid filled". Well done Einstein. If you do not wish to read such Free Speech content there is an IGNORE BUTTON....which I heartily recommend the use of. So much so.....that I will be using it to ignore YOU, chipmonk, and a few others after this posting .....so please do not bother to respond.
Mates ? No, I am particular with whom I associate. Blocked him about a year ago, along with several others. Although it looks as though he has reincarnated as another member on here... whose posts I can't be bothered to read. RS
You think this is bad, try Yahoo Answers and for God's sake, don't mention God. The Americans get very upset if you question God or religion. Ebay is next, don't try to sell am 'Feedback Motor' it' bot has a fit.