19th Jan 2019

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allsorts
  • Start date Start date
It takes in to account the new young voters - who are roughly 7:1 in favour of Remain.
So, you must concede , these new voters do not constitute “ everyone who voted in the last referendum? “
 
How do you reckon a ref held now would fair, Longs? Seriously, honestly - what is your understanding of the most likely outcome?

JJ can answer too.

And 'arry.

And CGN.

Oh poo - anyone can answer.
 
How do you reckon a ref held now would fair, Longs? Seriously, honestly - what is your understanding of the most likely outcome?

JJ can answer too.

And 'arry.

And CGN.

Oh poo - anyone can answer.

As you assume me to be a brexiteer, and therefore xeniohobic, then it is very easy to dismiss that there is a demand for housing, whether short or long term. I was just suggesting you could help take the strain off many councils who are housing immigrants in travel lodges.
 
Doesn't exclude them either.
The basic statement, “ everyone who voted in the last referendum “ is misleading though. You’d make a good politician DA. Probably should throw your lot in with Labour though ( that’d be your only way to get elected into government, because the Lib Dem’s just ain’t got a chance. :););)
 
How do you reckon a ref held now would fair, Longs? Seriously, honestly - what is your understanding of the most likely outcome?

JJ can answer too.

And 'arry.

And CGN.

Oh poo - anyone can answer.
The most likely outcome would be shackled to a fast failing EU, joining the Euro, and having to pay our share of the mess that follows the failure of their great federal experiment.
 
How do you reckon a ref held now would fair, Longs? Seriously, honestly - what is your understanding of the most likely outcome?
You dont have a valid link then?
OK. That's fine, I didn't for one moment expect you had.

"The most likely outcome of a second referendum"?
In all honesty I think remain would win, given the PROJECT FEAR MK 6.0, or whatever the tally is now.

The longterm consequences however, I think would be far more damaging to a supposed democratic, sovereign nation in that, large swathed of the population would fail to see the point in voting for anything ever again.

Just as the, EU like it.
 
Tell ya what DA, I’ve just returned from Tenerife, where many shopping malls have been built using EU money ( they are proud to point this out on the billboards outside) Trouble is, some of them have been built in the middle of nowhere. One, Parque Santiago 6, has some great shops, but very few customers. So few, that many retailers are considering moving into Playas Las Americas to pay more rent for similar sq footage, because they’re losing money due to the lack of footfall where they are at the moment. Within 5 or so years this retail complex will be empty and disused. ( no guesses who’s paid for it though ( and no it’s not the locals either))
 
As you assume me to be a brexiteer, and therefore xeniohobic, then it is very easy to dismiss that there is a demand for housing, whether short or long term. I was just suggesting you could help take the strain off many councils who are housing immigrants in travel lodges.
Margret Thatcher encouraged council's to sell off their housing stock but forbade them from building new council houses, this policy has continued with successive governments and combined with property developers greed has resulted in a lack of affordable housing.
 
You dont have a valid link then?
OK. That's fine, I didn't for one moment expect you had.

"The most likely outcome of a second referendum"?
In all honesty I think remain would win, given the PROJECT FEAR MK 6.0, or whatever the tally is now.

The longterm consequences however, I think would be far more damaging to a supposed democratic, sovereign nation in that, large swathed of the population would fail to see the point in voting for anything ever again.

Just as the, EU like it.
I saw the reference too, it popped up on the phone but I didn't read it.
 
The most likely outcome would be shackled to a fast failing EU, joining the Euro, and having to pay our share of the mess that follows the failure of their great federal experiment.
I agree with that too, jj.
I've 'liked' it to see if the europhile pathetically takes the bait again.
Bless, he thinks he has a point when commenting on who's liked a post rather than the post itself. Awwww.
 
Margret Thatcher encouraged council's to sell off their housing stock but forbade them from building new council houses, this policy has continued with successive governments and combined with property developers greed has resulted in a lack of affordable housing.

Did you not manage to buy your council house then chippie?, or if you did, why would you begrudge someone else the privilege of owning their own home?
 
Housing would be affordable if the workshy got of their bums and took a job
 
Back
Top