A car conundrum.

[Allsorts]

JJ, do you consider yourself to be a person of integrity? Honesty? Dignity?

 

[Allsorts]

DA will never accept that Junkers was * up on free champagne though. Much preferring to believe he’s a frail old man. ( yeah right, so why haven’t the EU retired him yet? Ohh, just remembered,, they can’t)

I actually said the guy looked as though he was rat-faced.

 

[Allsorts]

DA actually went on another forum ( which shall remain anonymous ) claiming he wasn’t forced to leave, but asked SF Peter to change his name to “ deleted member # xxxxx. ,,, whatever. ,,, ,, Deluded doesn’t even start to describe him.

Why so coy, JJ?

You are referring to Tom Plum's forum on which I am not - and never have been - a member.

But on which you have been creaming yourself regularly, thinking you can say stuff about me with no fear of retaliation.

It'll come as no surprise to half the population on this forum that what you've been saying on there was completely untrue.

Mr Plum is a man of integrity, honesty & decency, and he also knows the true situation of my departure (after initially having gotten it wrong... ). He has also posted a searing comment on 'that' thread outlining what he witnessed as being the main reason folk in Wigan voted to Leave - after you trying on there (as you do on here) to pretend it had nothing to do with xenophobia.

Mr Plum is your friend and I also consider him so. I wonder if he's impressed by everything you say and the way that you say it?

 

[goldenboy]

DA didn't abscond, he was thrown off in disgrace for a month for being a vile nasty piece of work, his henchmen kept their heads low but have recently been emboldened to return now he's back. Yuck.

I have always wanted to be a henchman. Nice one.

 

[chippie244]

I looked like a henchman.

 

[longboat]

You are referring to Tom Plum's forum on which I am not - and never have been - a member.

Then why would you send the administrator of a forum which you aren't a member of, asking him to explain your departure from a forum that he's not a member of? Weirdo.
Well, I dunno, he might be but he no longer has any input, and hasn't for quite some time.

But on which you have been creaming yourself regularly, thinking you can say stuff about me with no fear of retaliation.

Sign up then if your that bothered.
No, of course you won't. .
They'd run you out of business as soon as you started calling them 'knuckle draggers' for voting leave.
TPs allegiances to the 'member' that isn't, would quickly show when the fluttering of your lashes wears a bit thin.

Mr Plum is a man of integrity, honesty & decency, and he also knows the true situation of my departure

Thanks for providing an example.

(after initially having gotten it wrong...

Erich von Daniken proved us all wrong with 'the chariot of the God's'.

He has also posted a searing comment on 'that' thread outlining what he witnessed as being the main reason folk in Wigan voted to Leave - after you trying on there (as you do on here) to pretend it had nothing to do with xenophobia.

If he believes your tales I think we can rightly assume that he's open to any kind of poppycock, so long as it's delivered in an emotive fashion.

Mr Plum is your friend and I also consider him so. I wonder if he's impressed by everything you say and the way that you say it?

Just like that.

I can only imagine the depravity you've stooped to in private conversation in order to gain his favour.

Nothing about you is in anyway genuine, is it, DA?

 

[btiw2]

Hardly, could you imagine a debating society where one side makes an assertion, and the other side, rather than debate, simply say 'prove it', that would be schoolboy level, and that's exactly what you're doing, and what DA does.

Go on, be a man, prove him wrong, debate it, show us you have an intellect, you never know you might surprise us.

Like Chippie, you also apparently weren't a member of the debating society.

So you think this is a debate? I thought the only people who debated were precocious school-kids, politicians and wannabe politicians.

And, no, I've never been a member of debating society. I can't imagine any situation in which I'd want to join one either. It'd be quicker, and have the same effect, just getting a "I am a ****er" tattoo.
Debating society!? Jeez Filly, get a grip.

In a debate neither side admit they are wrong. Those debating defend (sometimes indefensible) positions to provide opposing views in order to help other participants (the audience) decide between positions.
But there's only the debaters here - nobody else is around to be persuaded.
Debating by yourself? That's master debating.

If y'all think that this is a debating society then it does explain why people on both sides sometimes try to argue things which are patently untrue.
It explains the polarisation into sides, teams, camps.
It also explains the use of rhetoric techniques. Based on some of the highfalutin posts here some posters think they're giving speeches - that they're Churchill reborn (they're very, very wrong).

But I thought we were discussing things - you know - like normal people. I see my mistake now.

I'm wasting my time with this post too, aren't I? As this could now become a "this house believes it is not debating" thread.

 

[Allsorts]

QUOTE="longboat Then why would you send the administrator of a forum which you aren't a member of, asking him to explain your departure from a forum that he's not a member of? Weirdo.

After I left SF I saw suggestions on here that it was Pete wot dun it, so I asked Tom if he could pass on the message that it wasn't - that's all. JJ was the obvious conduit for this, but Tom instead started a bludy thread on it...

If that makes me a weirdo, sobeit.

If he (Tom) believes your tales I think we can rightly assume that he's open to any kind of poppycock, so long as it's delivered in an emotive fashion.

Tom disagrees with me on just about everything political, including - possibly/probably - Brexit, although I don't know as we haven't discussed it - at all. But if he were a Leaver, the difference between Tom and the u-s on here is that he is blindingly honest and dignified, so he was completely upfront about the main reason he witnessed why the folk he knows in Wigan voted out. This was on his thread where JJ was, of course, telling porkies about me. Happy to cut-and-paste if it helps?

I can only imagine the depravity you've stooped to in private conversation in order to gain his favour. Shudder - it must be hellish indeed if it's your imagination we are talking about. But thankfully we also know it's fiction.

Nothing about you is in anyway genuine, is it, DA? Just everything, Longsie. Just everything. Including my utter contempt for mendaciousness.