Anyhoo, this evening Brexitiers got part of what

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 33931
  • Start date Start date
Hell, I might even sign it myself! Just for a laff!

'Cos it won't make an iota of difference. It won't even be discussed, let alone acted on.

Bless your hard-working li'l fingers, Fills.
 
Devil's Advocate said:
Look up 'irony'.

Understand it.

Then - seriously - eff-off.

You make me feel unclean.
Click to expand...
Would that be 'irony' as in the proper sense, or your 'irony' which covers everything you that you find difficult and a bit of a challenge to face up to?

"Eff-off".
Ooh, the predictably predictable response from a remainer when he sees something that actually makes him think for a bit.

Steady on tho, JoT is probably watching, you know. You must be really annoyed to use such language in front of him.
We'll have less of it, okay?
 
Correct first time, Longsie - it was irony in its truest sense.

One hundred per cent bona-fide.

Enjoy.
 
Devil's Advocate said:
Part of the great irony is how you - Longs - was once the 'rational' face of Brexit on here. Actually trying to pretend you had a reasoned case. When the u-s were scrabbling around hurling bigoted foulness, you kept trying to pretend it was all about the economy and 'sensible' things. How the façade has fallen away. You are now the lowest, most bigoted, least funny, most hate-filled, most rabid, most off-the-wall loony of them all. And when you look at your sidekicks, that's saying something
Click to expand...
Great stuff. Does that mean I've won?
What's the prize?
 
longboat said:
Would that be 'irony' as in the proper sense, or your 'irony' which covers everything you that you find difficult and a bit of a challenge to face up to?

"Eff-off".
Ooh, the predictably predictable response from a remainer when he sees something that actually makes him think for a bit.

Steady on tho, JoT is probably watching, you know. You must be really annoyed to use such language in front of him.
We'll have less of it, okay?
Click to expand...


He can say anything he wants, we are not connected at the waist, you realise, unlike your little elves.

If you hadn't noticed we don't agree on everything. But we do appear to have an overall apprecition of facts and realisation.

Fill your boots, I don't get upset with language, or even childish behaviour ( that is a good job because there are lots of kids amongst your little helpers) that you all resort to.
 
longboat said:
That there is proper irony.

Hehe.
Click to expand...

Well done! You've discovered it's true meaning!*

Now start to use it correctly, you ejit.


* Hang on, that doesn't mean that I am the ohnevermind... :-(
 
And, as on this forum, he keeps getting his fingers burnt.
 
Jackoftrades said:
He can say anything he wants, we are not connected at the waist, you realise, unlike your little elves.
Click to expand...
You see, DA?
It's not good to use 'your' kind of language in the presence of, JoT, it makes him come out with fairytale stuff like this, capeech?

I'm now king of the elves!

Bless, im.
 
longboat said:
You see, DA?
It's not good to use 'your' kind of language in the presence of, JoT, it makes him come out with fairytale stuff like this, capeech?

I'm now king of the elves!

Bless, im.
Click to expand...


Don't put yourself down.

You have been their king for ages. Can you not feel them hanging onto your very coat tails? What amazes me though, is that none of them can ever disagree from your comments, ever, about anything. Do you give them a script to follow ?
 
:mad:
Jackoftrades said:
Don't put yourself down.

You have been their king for ages. Can you not feel them hanging onto your very coat tails? What amazes me though, is that none of them can ever disagree from your comments, ever, about anything. Do you give them a script to follow ?
Click to expand...
You're not a great believer of democracy, are you?
You really shouldn't assume that your own behavioural traits must automatically be replicated in others. That simply isn't the case.
Your blatant subservience to, DA, is an issue you alone must deal with, it's unfair to cast your aspersions onto others who can - unlike you - actually think for themselves, and have proven over and over again to do so.
 
I’ve been away for a while. You know how television programmes have that “previously on...”[1]? I need a “previously on this thread”.

Except I don’t, do I? It’ll be a montage of:[2]
  • “I know you are, but what am I?”
  • “Here’s my favourite tabloid and it disagrees with your favourite tabloid” (for the pedantic the Guardian is still a tabloid even if it has big pages. Paper size is not corellated with truth - else billboards would always be true).
  • A fantastically insightful comment made by a newbie which everyone ignores.
  • A fastically banal comment by (DA or IIR) which (JoT or Filly) feel they have to defend. This will continue for many pages.
  • Harry posting (puts on pompous voice) “Quite right [insert name here]” - like he’s the effin’ referee of what’s right. Although, in fairness, he is often right. Far right.
  • DA defending the indefensible because it was said by someone he likes.
  • JJ attacking someone who makes more money than him.
  • Longs assuming that someone who makes a lot of money is automatically virtuous (whilst skilfully avoiding conflict with JJ). Unless it someone DA is defending - in which case the wealthy person is a hypocrite.

Then someone will admit that they’ve mistaken and have re-evaluated their position.
Nahhh. They won’t. But it’d be a great cliff hanger for a series[3] finale if they did.

Credits
No animals were harmed during the production of this post[5]. Any similarity to persons living or dead is to be expected - you’re not unique.

[1] do they still do that? At the risk of getting all recursive I need a “previously on television formulae”.
[2] persona dramatis (is that how you spell it?): DA, JoT, JJ, Longs, Filly, IIR
[3] Series? Season? Are we American yet? If so, can I shoot someone? If so, can my killing spree start with footnote 2?
[5] but a fair bit of liquor was murdered[4]. Soz for the spelling mistakes.
[4] that’s why footnote 4 follows footnote 5. As always, I’m out of order.
 
longboat said:
:mad:
You're not a great believer of democracy, are you?
You really shouldn't assume that your own behavioural traits must automatically be replicated in others. That simply isn't the case.
Your blatant subservience to, DA, is an issue you alone must deal with, it's unfair to cast your aspersions onto others who can - unlike you - actually think for themselves, and have proven over and over again to do so.
Click to expand...


Let me know when you wake up?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top