Dead or alive?

If he has been as sad/mad or bad as others have said then on other forums he would have been banned for life! :confused:
 
Dr Bodgit said:
Following the theory of quantum mechanics, DA is both alive and dead at the same time. His state becomes one or the other only when observed, which no one can in this virtual world.
Click to expand...
Ahh, DA, is actually Schrodingers cat then. A paradox. ;);)
 
Where has Facilities gone?
He hasn't been about for a few days.
 
DIYDave. said:
To me, all rather boring and pointless and actually, pretty sad that someone has to continuously test how far they can push the ‘decency’ boundaries, play mind games with other members and give the mods no other choice than to ban them
Click to expand...

Et tu, Dave? :oops:


"Behave one and all :) "

I'll do my best...
 
btiw2 said:
Lighten up. There wasn’t a point.

DA’s been banned three times in about a fortnight. The first for being argumentative and combative - true, but the last two are just DA being mischievous. That’s not testing decency boundaries. It’s just DA being a cheeky monkey.

He’s posting comments he knows will get him immediately banned (what was it? Less than 30 seconds?) before anyone other than SF Pete will read them.

I think DA has taken himself out of the forum for a laugh and to remove the temptation of his argument addiction. Probably so he can get some peace and quiet and get more work done.

Or maybe it’s an altruistic gesture- it’s us (u-s?) who’ll receive peace and quiet too. Nah. Probably not that.

He know’s he’ll be insta-banned for his magic SF Pete trigger phrase, so he’s not really causing trouble.

Good on the mad, eccentric, argumentative old codger (I write safe in the knowledge of no comeback).
Click to expand...

Thank you, b-2.
 
Deleted member 11267 said:
He has got five that I can think of,so probably more.
Click to expand...

This is going to be good... :rolleyes:

You will name them, of course? And anyone else who'd like to do so is also welcome.

And I will reply with the actual honest figure including names - even if it gets me banned again (there, that's a clue.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CGN said:
Well said Dave. I think DA fantasises about being Steve McQueen in the great escape, and expects adulation and a hearty slap on the back on return. One problem, this is SF, and its not rock n roll!
Click to expand...

That presumptuous post speaks volumes about your character, CGN.
 
Devil's Advocate said:
Thank you, b-2.
Click to expand...
You're welcome, but I wasn't really defending you.
I just thought people were misrepresenting your last couple of bans.
I thought it was pretty obvious that you were trying to be banned and it wasn't really about causing offence.
I could be wrong though.
Devil's Advocate said:
This is going to be good... :rolleyes:

You will name them, of course? And anyone else who'd like to do so is also welcome.

And I will reply with the actual honest figure including names - even if it gets me banned again (there, that's a clue.)
Click to expand...
Okay. I was wrong. This is a vendetta now, isn't it?
 
btiw2 said:
You're welcome, but I wasn't really defending you.
I just thought people were misrepresenting your last couple of bans.
I thought it was pretty obvious that you were trying to be banned and it wasn't really about causing offence.
I could be wrong though.

Okay. I was wrong. This is a vendetta now, isn't it?
Click to expand...

Seriously, 'thank you' for saying it as you honestly saw it, that's all. Doesn't really matter if you were wrong. (Well, it does - a bit)

But it's not what certain others have predictably done, of course - even tho' they know exactly what's going on. So, 'thank you'.*

Vendetta? Moi? Nah.

But I do have stuff to say - but it'll all be delivered within 'non-ban' criteria - no name calling of Dobbs. I'll let the info speak for itself.


*I bet you wish I stopped saying 'thank you'?
 
Tackle the issues DA, not the person.

You have a lot to contribute to this forum and have done so in the past. A lot.

But please stay clear of the personals so we can all benefit from your more enlightened side.
 
What I most missed from this forum is being patronised :D

Yeah, point taken, Bodge. :)

But, man, I enjoyed calling Dobbs for what he is. Twice...


"'Cos he's worth it"
 
I've just checked. You're not banned yet, there's still time!

DA, to quote DrB.
Dr Bodgit said:
You have a lot to contribute to this forum and have done so in the past. A lot.
Click to expand...
I don't think Dr B was trying to be patronising. You should take that as a solid four star review.

I'm going to try and echo Dr B's comment (but in my own rambling style).

I have no control or influence over the content you post to these forums.
I have no desire to control or influence it either. Not only would it make the place boring, but I'm pretty sure I couldn't.

But speaking as a consumer of content: I think posters are at their best when examining a position using facts and honest opinion combined with light sarcasm, wit and wordplay.
You're often really good at those sorts of posts. I'm not saying that you have to supply those, just that's what I enjoy reading.

It's a shame that you missed the homeopathy thread. It would benefited from your comments, and even you would have been hard-pushed to turn it into a Brexit thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top