Khashoggi.

  • Thread starter Thread starter joinerjohn1
  • Start date Start date
Allsorts said:
You are lying, IIR, to yourself. To no-one else.

"Why does it need to be an actual journalist..."? Well, actual credible journalists, who do an amazing job (chasing the truth, often at risk to their lives (oh look - I am talking about people like Khashoggi) - are an ever endangered species, what with Trump proclaiming the very best of impartial American News sources as 'Fake News', and your Mail shouting 'enemies of the people' at those who uphold the rule of law) deserve to be respected and given an unhindered voice.

They do not deserve to be lampooned by scurrilous right-wing Facebook sites who very deliberately use a name chosen to confuse; eg with the real 'Australian News Network', or another beaut I picked someone local up on, CNN (The Christian News Network (anything but 'Christian' in their lying bigoted behaviour. Or perhaps that should be, just like many Christians?)

You have not one iota of functioning critical faculties, IIR. You care not a jot about the truth. You search for anything that'll satisfy your wee beastie.

Two types. Two types.
Click to expand...


As for caring about truth, thats why I don't follow the Beeb or the Guardian.
If you what the truth don't turn to the left for it.

Look at these pipe bombs in America, the left are already trying to put them on Trump. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Isitreally said:
As for caring about truth, thats why I don't follow the Beeb or the Guardian.
If you what the truth don't turn to the left for it.

Look at these pipe bombs in America, the left are already trying to put them on Trump. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
Click to expand...
You don't care about the truth, you care about having your prejudices being reinforced.
 
Isitreally said:
:p:p:p:p:p:p

What the hell has any of that got to do with asking protestor what they are poetesting about.
Click to expand...

You are lying to yourself.

Any gurning idiot can pretend they are a journalist when they are not. Any gurning idiot can wade in to any crowd and stick a microphone in front of folk at random until they find someone who cannot articulate why they are there, and then try and make a bigger point by it. Any gurning idiot can post their completely selective 'results' on a fake right-wing Facebook site which tries to pretend it's actually an established and respected Aussie news service. Any gurning idiot can pretend to be asking questions but then demonstrate their true agenda by laughing at their interviewees.

It doesn't take a genius, just a devious and scurrilous slimeball with a right-wing agenda.

That's fine. That is not really a problem. It should not really be an issue. We should all laugh them out of court, as they deserve.

It becomes a Trumpian problem, however, when bigger idiots fall for it. That's bad, but what's even worse is when knowing lying, devious and scurrilous individuals try and use this 'info' to pretend they have made a legitimate point.

Fortunately there are slightly brighter folk around like me ready to correct them.

You little Tommy lover, you.
 
Allsorts said:
You are lying to yourself.

Any gurning idiot can pretend they are a journalist when they are not. Any gurning idiot can wade in to any crowd and stick a microphone in front of folk at random until they find someone who cannot articulate why they are there, and then try and make a bigger point by it. Any gurning idiot can post their completely selective 'results' on a fake right-wing Facebook site which tries to pretend it's actually an established and respected Aussie news service. Any gurning idiot can pretend to be asking questions but then demonstrate their true agenda by laughing at their interviewees.

It doesn't take a genius, just a devious and scurrilous slimeball with a right-wing agenda.

That's fine. That is not really a problem. It should not really be an issue. We should all laugh them out of court, as they deserve.

It becomes a Trumpian problem, however, when bigger idiots fall for it. That's bad, but what's even worse is when knowing lying, devious and scurrilous individuals try and use this 'info' to pretend they have made a legitimate point.

Fortunately there are slightly brighter folk around like me ready to correct them.

You little Tommy lover, you.
Click to expand...


Swap the word RIGHT for LEFT and nothing different

Allsorts said:
Thank you.

Two of the most respected, accurate and evidence-based news sources on this planet. No wonder you hate them.
Click to expand...


That's all anyone need to see to understand where you're coming from.

Respect doesn't negate truth, just that your on the same side and boy are both of the above on your side.
 
Isitreally said:
Swap the word RIGHT for LEFT and nothing different.
Click to expand...

You are absolutely right, IIR. I agree 100%.

Find me such a site, ideally one that anyone on here has linked to (although not essential) and I will call it as being a 'devious and scurrilous slimeball with a left-wing agenda'.

I will. I promise.


Ideally make sure it's a near equivalent to the 'Aussie News Network'.
 
Last edited:
Isitreally said:
That's all anyone need to see to understand where you're coming from.

Respect doesn't negate truth, just that your on the same side and boy are both of the above on your side.
Click to expand...

Thank you thank you thank you.

Try a Google, eg 'what are the most reliable/trustworthy news sources in the world?' The BBC will almost always appear in the top 5 in the world. The Guardian - just a wee British paper - will very likely appear in the top 10 - in the world.

(Yes, the Guardian in particular has a bias - which they are completely open about - but that does not generally affect the accuracy or trustworthiness or quality of what they report; they are a hugely respected news group with very impressive investigative journalists.)

And I respect them because they are accurate, evidence-based news sources, not because they agree with me.

So - thank you - I am obviously pleased that they are 'on my side'. The side of reliability, accuracy and trustworthiness.

Did I say 'thank you'? I mean it - thank you.



Now tell us your news sources.
 
Allsorts said:
You are absolutely right, IIR. I agree 100%.

Find me such a site, ideally one that anyone on here has linked to (although not essential) and I will call it as being a 'devious and scurrilous slimeball with a left-wing agenda'.

I will. I promise.


Ideally make sure it's a near equivalent to the 'Aussie News Network'.
Click to expand...


Antifa. ??
 
Allsorts said:
Thank you thank you thank you.

Try a Google, eg 'what are the most reliable/trustworthy news sources in the world?' The BBC will almost always appear in the top 5 in the world. The Guardian - just a wee British paper - will very likely appear in the top 10 - in the world.

(Yes, the Guardian in particular has a bias - which they are completely open about - but that does not generally affect the accuracy or trustworthiness or quality of what they report; they are a hugely respected news group with very impressive investigative journalists.)

And I respect them because they are accurate, evidence-based news sources, not because they agree with me.

So - thank you - I am obviously pleased that they are 'on my side'. The side of reliability, accuracy and trustworthiness.

Did I say 'thank you'? I mean it - thank you.



Now tell us your news sources.
Click to expand...


Again because it fits the agenda.

What they don't report is, whats actually going on more what isn't.
 
Isitreally said:
Antifa. ??
Click to expand...

Never heard of them. Can't recall anyone on here linking to them or using info from them either.

A quick glance on reviews suggests it's a giant pile of extreme-left BS, so if this is the case I am happy to state categorically that I will never ever use them as a source of info. So no change there, as I never ever have done, and I'm not aware of anyone else on here having done so either.


Tell us about the 'Aussie News Network', IIR?
 
Isitreally said:
Again because it fits the agenda.

What they don't report is, whats actually going on more what isn't.
Click to expand...

Yes, the agenda of truth, accuracy and balance. Evidence and research-based news.

I understand you have trouble with this concept.

NO-ONE believes you, IIR - not even your sidekicks. Not even you. You KNOW you are trying to delude both yourself and others.

It won't work.
 
Allsorts said:
Yes, the agenda of truth, accuracy and balance. Evidence and research-based news.

I understand you have trouble with this concept.

NO-ONE believes you, IIR - not even your sidekicks. Not even you. You KNOW you are trying to delude both yourself and others.

It won't work.
Click to expand...


The Beeb are well know for left wing bias, how is it you dont know this. ???

There's even a website about their bias.

https://biasedbbc.org
 
You've already amply demonstrated that you can find anything on the interweb, even fake journalists on fake news sites.

Completely devoid of intellectual integrity and dignity.

No-one believes you, IIR. No-one. Not even you.
 
Allsorts said:
You've already amply demonstrated that you can find anything on the interweb, even fake journalists on fake news sites.

Completely devoid of intellectual integrity and dignity.

No-one believes you, IIR. No-one. Not even you.
Click to expand...


Why are they fake, its not news as you what it to be, but calling it fake just shows how brainwashed by the leftist media you are.
 
Allsorts said:
You've already amply demonstrated that you can find anything on the interweb, even fake journalists on fake news sites.

Completely devoid of intellectual integrity and dignity.

No-one believes you, IIR. No-one. Not even you.
Click to expand...


How many people on her have dissed me compared to you, even those, on your side have questioned some of your motives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top