Not again

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phil the Paver
  • Start date Start date
Thing is, free movement of good people across borders, also means free movement of bad people across the same borders. You can bet your life that the Schengen Agreement is going to get some serious discussion in the EU parliament next year.
 
joinerjohn1 said:
Thing is, free movement of good people across borders, also means free movement of bad people across the same borders. You can bet your life that the Schengen Agreement is going to get some serious discussion in the EU parliament next year.
Click to expand...
Discussion,,,,
That's it.
 
Phil the Paver said:
Should have tried Google. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Throwing that old race card again I see.
Click to expand...

Nope.

All I did was post a selection of the comments made by the usual suspects on here, along with a definition of racism. (And a very random selection too - over roughly a dozen pages in threads that went on for 100's. There's lots more where that came from...)

I'll let others make the judgement.

If it helps, I am not calling you - or anyone else - an out-and-out racist. But I would appreciate some people taking a sober look at the way they seem to be painting a 'people' as if they were all the same.

Let's be blunt here - there is NOTHING special about you or me or anyone else on here.

We have won life's lottery, but I fear some of us have lost out humanity in the process.
 
longboat said:
Oh, I get ya. Absolutely right, DA, you are.

I don't think it's the wisest of strategies too allow unchecked asylum seekers into any country, so therefore I am a racist, and you choose others words to back that up,,,, hmmm?
I don't agree with your way of thinking, so, naturally my way is the polar opposite of yours?

Bravo, DA, bravo!
Click to expand...

They are not unchecked.

Where do you get your information from?
 
joinerjohn1 said:
Sadly, we know he was ultra religious Chip, and according to Isis, they've managed to get a (few ?) more of them into Europe under the asylum seeker badge. You tell me which ones and I'll gladly point them out to the authorities,,,, Oh you can't ,,, How convenient.. Fact is neither can the authorities know which ones they are.
Click to expand...
He wasn't religious, he dealt drugs, took alcohol and slept around..
 
chippie244 said:
He wasn't religious, he dealt drugs, took alcohol and slept around..
Click to expand...
....and tried his best too slaughter as many innocent men, women and children with an articulated truck.
He did that for his twisted religious beliefs hoping that his god and associated believers would be proud of him.
 
longboat said:
Oh, I get ya. Absolutely right, DA, you are.

I don't think it's the wisest of strategies too allow unchecked asylum seekers into any country, so therefore I am a racist, and you choose others words to back that up,,,, hmmm?
I don't agree with your way of thinking, so, naturally my way is the polar opposite of yours?

Bravo, DA, bravo!
Click to expand...

Sarcy ain't good, Longs.

Asylum seekers are not unchecked. What you are trying to imply there is a Faragism.

And another Faragism is to think what he says suddenly allows you to unleash the beast within with impunity. You can't.

Re-read that selection - a small selection - of comments made by peeps on this forum, when suddenly they thought they were allowed to talk like this without risking being called 'racist'.

If anyone tries to paint all or most these refugees as being the 'same' and also negatively when all the facts demonstrate the exact opposite, then you know what that is called.

"very common practice, judging by the amount at this ONE restaurant.

"a plague of locusts"

"We read far too often of immigrants/ asylum seekers coming here with nothing to offer this country"

"Or as more likely laugh at what mugs the British are"

"Being swamped with migrants soaking up our health services...

"Why should a European Court uphold the right of foreign murderers , killers, uninsured drivers who have killed in road accidents, rapists, violent criminals etc to live and claim benefits in the UK?" Example?

"the vast majority of moderate Muslims ...want the minority of radical Muslims...to behead the non believers"

"Or are they just 'hell-bent' on breaking in? I know what I think."

etc etc etc.
 
Devil's Advocate said:
Sarcy ain't good, Longs.

Asylum seekers are not unchecked. What you are trying to imply there is a Faragism.

And another Faragism is to think what he says suddenly allows you to unleash the beast within with impunity. You can't.

Re-read that selection - a small selection - of comments made by peeps on this forum, when suddenly they thought they were allowed to talk like this without risking being called 'racist'.

If anyone tries to paint all or most these refugees as being the 'same' and also negatively when all the facts demonstrate the exact opposite, then you know what that is called.

"very common practice, judging by the amount at this ONE restaurant.

"a plague of locusts"

"We read far too often of immigrants/ asylum seekers coming here with nothing to offer this country"

"Or as more likely laugh at what mugs the British are"

"Being swamped with migrants soaking up our health services...

"Why should a European Court uphold the right of foreign murderers , killers, uninsured drivers who have killed in road accidents, rapists, violent criminals etc to live and claim benefits in the UK?" Example?

"the vast majority of moderate Muslims ...want the minority of radical Muslims...to behead the non believers"

"Or are they just 'hell-bent' on breaking in? I know what I think."

etc etc etc.
Click to expand...
What checks, DA? How is it possible to adequately check an individual's background when all you have to go on is a name and where they are from? Bearing in mind that the information supplied could quite easily be false.
They're claiming asylum non-the less, so it's the norm to relocate these people whilst their claim goes through the system, taking months or even year's to finalise.
In the mean time, the whole of the schengen area is pretty much their oyster.

It is in fact YOU who insists they are all the same, not me.
 
Ahh , but you forget about DA's rose tinted lenses in his Specsavers specials. You know the ones, they allow you to see the world as a nice place , where people are always civil to each other and everyone respects the other , no matter what religion, social class they are. The world where everyone has the same rights, until they are either victims or an arrested perpetrator.
You watch and see how long the investigation into the victims of Berlin's latest atrocity takes.. I bet it'll be a lot shorter than the investigation surrounding the shooting of the perpetrator in Italy.
 
He is not viewing the world through rose tinted specs, his condescending manner suggests that he would rather have others viewing 'him' through the rosies more than anything else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top