Right or Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isitreally
  • Start date Start date
Tell me chip, just how much more money was spent on the Remain campaign, compared to the Leave campaign ? Then tell me why both parties were not bound by the same spending agreement ?
So you're not going to answer how much was fraudulently spent and how many fines?
 
So you're not going to answer how much was fraudulently spent and how many fines?
I’ll answer that when you explain just how the Remain campaign, were allowed to spend £ millions more than the winning campaign.
 
I’ll answer that when you explain just how the Remain campaign, were allowed to spend £ millions more than the winning campaign.
That was the rules.
Do you not agree that electoral fraud is wrong?
Rules are rules.
 
That was the rules.
Do you not agree that electoral fraud is wrong?
Rules are rules.
Oh, so the rules allow one campaign in a two horse race to spend £millions more on their campaign ? I bet the EU drew up these rules,,,,,, didn’t they ;);)
 
David Davis, a leaver was put in charge of negotiations and he bailed, Dom Raab, a leaver was then put in charge of negotiations and then bailed on the deal he had negotiated!
Perhaps this isn't the simplistic deal that the leavers sold it as.
How many times have the leave campaign been fined for electoral fraud?
Just saying...


You clearly haven't been follow the so called negotiations have you.

Davis and now Raab resigned because they didn't do any negotiations as such, but were expected to follow the government's (MAYs) line and both were brave enough to say NO.

If May hasn't gone by the end of this week it will be a minor miracle.

Who will take over???
 
Oh, so the rules allow one campaign in a two horse race to spend £millions more on their campaign ? I bet the EU drew up these rules,,,,,, didn’t they ;);)
No they didn't,
By your reply I take it that you are happy with electoral fraud.
 
T
You clearly haven't been follow the so called negotiations have you.

Davis and now Raab resigned because they didn't do any negotiations as such, but were expected to follow the government's (MAYs) line and both were brave enough to say NO.

If May hasn't gone by the end of this week it will be a minor miracle.

Who will take over???
They both realised it was an impossible task because it is a really stupid idea.
 
T

They both realised it was an impossible task because it is a really stupid idea.


You're right it is.

I mean how can you leave but not really leave?? (Stupid or what)

Hence why they and many others have resigned, though in not sure how Esta Mcvay has the front to use the line "how could I face my constituants:" after the abortion of Universal Credit.
 
Has anybody else come up with a workable solution than won't cripple the UK for years to come?
 
Yes.

Just walk.
Look at the second bit of my question, the bit about crippling the UK.
If you don't think that walking will cripple our economy then you're a bigger idiot than I took you for and that takes some doing.
 
Look at the second bit of my question, the bit about crippling the UK.
If you don't think that walking will cripple our economy then you're a bigger idiot than I took you for and that takes some doing.


Prue speculation on your behave, nobody know exactly what will happen as proved by the total lack of doom and gloom as predicted by your side if we voted leave.

But what is certain if the bill goes through, the EU will punish us big time as a threat to others that any thoughts of leaving will result in the same.

You really don't understand the EU policies and long terms goals do you.
 
Ignoring your usual lack of ability to write in English we do know what will happen if we crash out without a deal, utter chaos.
Even with a deal the most optomistic leavers are predicting a ten year downturn.
The EU aren't punishing us, they are acting as a bloc in their best interests as will every other country and trade bloc in the world.
You don't understand anything do you?
 
Ignoring your usual lack of ability to write in English we do know what will happen if we crash out without a deal, utter chaos.
Even with a deal the most optomistic leavers are predicting a ten year downturn.
The EU aren't punishing us, they are acting as a bloc in their best interests as will every other country and trade bloc in the world.
You don't understand anything do you?


I understand May has done exactly what she set out to do in trying to stop Brexit through the back door, she put this deal together without a hope in hell of it getting through, but to cause enough confusion amougst the plebs that a second ref could well be on the cards.

Trouble is I think it will backfire in that she will not be around to steer us into that ref.
 
To be honest I don't spend much time listening to old bores from 43 years ago, you'll be dusting down the "Rivers of blood" next.
 
I understand May has done exactly what she set out to do in trying to stop Brexit through the back door, she put this deal together without a hope in hell of it getting through, but to cause enough confusion amougst the plebs that a second ref could well be on the cards.

Trouble is I think it will backfire in that she will not be around to steer us into that ref.
I am no May supporter but she has to try and reconcile two diametrically opposed sides of her own party, nevermind the country, and also get it approved by the EU.
If she goes for hard Brexit the country is ruined for generations, soft Brexit pleases nobody, no Brexit and we keep the status quo.
Cameron should be treated to RS's version of punishment for putting us in this position.
 
Back
Top