There are ways, even with TOR. It does feel that it's assuming a higher level of competence than the posts indicate.
It is quite a common word on salmon fishing websites where it will have additional adjectives describing size, colour, weight, lice ... The sites accept it but some browsers and child filters object.
Because this area is open to the general public and he would be able to see it. Peter did comment on my post in May on the Select forum.
Hi mate, I haven't got a clue. Screwfix give you a rating based on a number of things, comments, advice, likes etc. You can be promoted or demoted at their will. There is probably a logic to it but I am not aware of it other than that.
Oh i see...kinda makes sense i suppose. I have no interest in being in the magic circle. Dont really understand why .peter at screwfix or what ever he calls himself cant post on open forum...?
Ne can, but the Troll would see it and know what was being planned and develop his plan to circumvent it.
Of course..understand that. Maybe some open forum members need a bit of reasurance from mods that something is at least trying to get sorted. Cant imagine the female members wish to see the trolls latest pictorial offerings...
They would have to be 'Screwfix Select' to see the pickies, that's why I got myself demoted.....couldn't stand the constant porn.
James May said it to Jeremy Clarkson all the time. On primetime BBC, before the 9pm watershed. I think that's a bit harsh of the mods. Still - their forum, their rules.
Alfred Hitchcock? Shuttlecock? Weathercock? Bibcock? Cockatiel? Cockeyed? Cocky? Cockney? Cockpit? Cocksure? Cockroach? Cock-up? (Never by me though, obviously) Cocktails? Peacock? ...... and plenty more. Bit harsh as I said.
Surely the mods could put out a post saying they are aware of the problem and are working on ways to deal with it, not saying what they are planning on doing tho. Anything from them would be better than the complete silence we are getting at the moment.