As I said, if you are referring to me, you are out of order. Now produce the proof of the 'fact' where I or Mr Ha said those words. Or apologise for lying.
In response to me pointing out that only a teeny tiny minority of Muslims carry out these atrocities, the exact actual words written on this forum in reply by either you (Mr Ha) or JJ (tho' my recollection is that it was you); "...the majority mighty not carry out bombings, but the vast majority want them to." I won't be apologising, Mr Ha, but you ought to.
Oops, soz - I did suggest you had claimed it was 'all' whereas it was only 'the vast majority'. Sorry.
Ahem, if you have the 'exact' words, you will be able to post the thread link(or actual post) that it appeared. Come on
I guess it must have been another deleted thread as I can no longer find it. It was a long time ago too - possibly even before the Ref? Not sure. Hey, deny it if you wish, Mr Ha, it really doesn't matter. Tho' why HarDeBloody is so exercised about Mr Ha's posts I cannot understand. I do swear on my children's and my dawg's lives it is correct tho'...
I can tell you now it is not correct, nor is it my belief. And therefore, I do hope you don't have children or a dog.
Chip got banned? ... OK , I do try my best to stay of politics even more so out of personal vendettas, but tempted to bin this board, as rather childish "who's right'erererer" discussions are not that... Google up alternative to each different aspect/nature in question and be happy
It was said - these exact words. Almost certainly by you. Possibly by JJ. But if you are now distancing yourse.. - er, Mr Ha - from that expression and state it is not your - er, his - belief, then I am pleased. (Oh, I have two of each - and all in rude health. Fido? FIDO!)
That's a nice sentiment, Alvy, and also a suggestion I have made on here myself; use Google to obtain the 'facts' on a story. This will almost certainly churn up variations on these 'facts', so the next thing to do is to use a credible website checker to determine the credibility and bias of each source. Choose only the ones with a high fact-checked trust level, and you can't go much wrong. The problem, Alvy, is that many human beings are not willing to do this as it doesn't serve their purpose and factual facts are therefore a hindrance. You only have to watch how Trump speaks to his specific audience, using lie after distortion after lie after distortion after lie. That is what they want to hear. Ditto on this side of the pond with Brexit. (Which is why many Leavers are also fans of Trump; similar ideology and similar techniques.) Sleep well, Alvy; I have a hunch that 2019 is the year when populism is kicked in to next week. On both sides of the pond.
Look, it wasn't said by you - it was almost certainly Mr Ha. And I won't be letting you anywhere near my dawgs or kids.
The silence by remain against this is deafening. What would they make of this. (Contain mild swearing)
Slander, my friend. And I have no desire to be anywhere near your kids or dog. You have cursed them yourself.
Do you have any links to a 'credible website checker' we could all use? Well, if the 'guards' are unguarded, I can see a whole muchness of wrongness. I agree. How many votes did remain garner through this exact premise? I'd say about 10-12 million. Trump, again! I thought I suggested you should stop such banality. You never listen. You won't even listen to the truth as told by the leaders of your, EU, ideology as to the way they plan for ever greater unification. Your hunch is nothing more than wishful thinking. It's what you want to hear. Which, 'credible fact checked website' did you get this hunch from I wonder?
Think you will find its libel. Rather than slander. I thought you and HandyAndy had no connection though.
Har - Mr Ha - whoeves - my sincere apologies. The only trace I could find of that post is here #549 https://community.screwfix.com/threads/article-50.181579/page-28#post-1445303 and it was by JJ. Sorry
Forums
Facebook
Twitter
You Tube
Instagram
Shop