Replacing my 1155 & 1156 systems here in a few weeks, had them six years or so, time for an over due upgrade.
Socket 775 doesn't meet W10 specs I believe, but will run, some of the required drivers for the motherboard arn't available.
Also have to think why the seller has other computers where windows 10 is in stock? Weird. Mr. HandyAndy - Really
Have always built my own pc's,I like being able to choose my components, years ago you could save building your own, today I'm not so sure.
IS 10 FASTER ON BOOT-UP THAN 7?! Sheeesh - simple Q, dudes Oh, all right. then - I'll surf... (that KIAB cove ain't wot he used to be... )
Boot speed up would be significantly faster if you shoved the OS, be it 7 or 10 on an SSD drive The right hardware will be best for determining boot speed. 7 & 10 boot up is about the same. Also depends how many start up programs you run.
Much faster - SSD's are the way to go! It'll also still be fast two years down the line when there's 20 odd things running on start up... You not only get the speed now, but it remains for the lifetime of the SSD. The days of reading a platter are on the way out for boot drives.
As Kool has already mention, put OS on a SSD & boot up is quick, Ferrari quick, I now boot up in around 20 seconds now, compared to minutes before. A lot of SSD's come with a migration utility to move OS from HDD to SSD.
One other major advantage with a SSD is NO fragmentation that you get with a hard drive, so you don't need to defrag.
To answer (or at least give my opinion) one some of the questions above: - I think 10 is faster to boot and in operation, than 7. I was sceptical about upgrading from 7 to 10 but I have to say 10 is pretty good. - An SSD for the OS is definitely going to improve performance, but be aware of SSD failures and ensure any important data is backed up (I keep backup of all data using SyncToy plus image the drives onto a NAS). - Building your own PC is not cheap but then you'd only do it if you want a custom/performance build. If all you want is a standard PC for browsing and the like, off the shelf will be cheaper.
If you stick with the best SSD's you have a better chance of having a long living hard drive. But, backing up should be 2nd nature. I have seen it countless times where people think the computer is indestructible only to lose all their data in one fell swoop! I have certainly built cheaper PC's than one could buy. New for new that is. Nothing 2nd hand!
I don't back up....Because Veeam does it automatically to my NAS. Incrementally weekly and full monthly. Then the NAS backs up to another NAS I'm not losing any data
Kool. Er, I mean, cool. Yup - SSDs look like the way to go. It will mean an extra £30-odd, and I don't think it'll be that important for the guy. Mind you, I'm now gonna get one for myself as I have this wee all-in-one which is an absolute PAIN to boot - it takes seemingly minutes, and the HD chatter throughout is awful (not faulty, just noticeable). I've completely restored it back to factory settings, and that's made sodall difference. I've chosen a PC for my friend and will see how it performs - I can give him the option of upgrading to SSD if he wants to afterwards (I doubt he will, tho' - anything will be better than what he currently has!) (I've gorn for a very tidy HP Compaq Pro 6000, core2duo 3.0GHz, 4GB RAM with Win 7 and COA.) Thanks all - really appreciated.