What version of leave is acceptable as leave?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chippie244
  • Start date Start date
Baxi Boy said:
In other words,we leave in name only,we pay billions for even less than we get now,and the foreigners will keep flooding in here,so in effect possibly worse off than the evils of being a full member! Out on WTO rules is what should have been decided years ago,to get our country and freedom back!
Click to expand...
That wasn't on the ballot paper.
 
Vixere said:
[QUOTE="longboat, post: 1697379, member: 158215"

I've never called you a liar, chip's, not once.
It's not something I'd generically do when cornered, as I believe it to be a particularly weak and lazy accusation.
Click to expand...

This sounds like Mogg's insincere claim of "playing the ball not the man", until his veneer - albeit more toughly laminated than L's - also cracked. I'm guessing Longsie doesn't have the comfort of a £200m fortune, and a post-Ref vote income of, what is it - £17m? - to bolster him. Not to mention a now-EU-protected hedge-fund company that will make a certain killing on the resulting stockmarket fall should we actually leave.

Whether Longsie actually believed what he was saying or not, he did accuse - was it Allsorts? - of fabricating a search for a PC for his mum in law; he accused him of lying over this, inventing the thread for attention.

Just let that sink in for a moment.

And he did everything in his power to try and discredit the most successful community-owned wind farm in the country's attempts to tackle a huge multi-national company who wanted the Island's spoils for their own pocket. (That's going well, by the way. As is the Islander's campaign to change Scottish land law.)

And, of course, some of his scurrilous sidekicks confettied his every post with 'likes'. What are they like.

Longsie, I was kind when I claimed I saw through your gossamer-thin veneer waaaay back - which I did - but I also always knew it was a faux paper print on shuttering ply.[/QUOTE]
You couldn't come up with any evidence either then.
By 'eck, you must have been spitting tacks typing that.
 
longboat said:
This sounds like Mogg's insincere claim of "playing the ball not the man", until his veneer - albeit more toughly laminated than L's - also cracked. I'm guessing Longsie doesn't have the comfort of a £200m fortune, and a post-Ref vote income of, what is it - £17m? - to bolster him. Not to mention a now-EU-protected hedge-fund company that will make a certain killing on the resulting stockmarket fall should we actually leave.

Whether Longsie actually believed what he was saying or not, he did accuse - was it Allsorts? - of fabricating a search for a PC for his mum in law; he accused him of lying over this, inventing the thread for attention.

Just let that sink in for a moment.

And he did everything in his power to try and discredit the most successful community-owned wind farm in the country's attempts to tackle a huge multi-national company who wanted the Island's spoils for their own pocket. (That's going well, by the way. As is the Islander's campaign to change Scottish land law.)

And, of course, some of his scurrilous sidekicks confettied his every post with 'likes'. What are they like.

Longsie, I was kind when I claimed I saw through your gossamer-thin veneer waaaay back - which I did - but I also always knew it was a faux paper print on shuttering ply.
Click to expand...
You couldn't come up with any evidence either then.
By 'eck, you must have been spitting tacks typing that.[/QUOTE]

You've lost the plot Trevor :):)
 
Odd Bodkin said:
In the interests of impartiality here's a remoaner defending himself from Andrew Marr.
In 2016. You'll struggle to find as much misinformation and outright bullshine as the Leave campaign have been caught out time and again; knowingly making it up as they go along and being fined for doing so.
And when the PM scurries back to the EU don't be surprised if they all hide behind the door and pretend to be out. They must be sick of the sight of that bloody woman trying to pass the same deal over and over; and no, changing the font doesn't make it a different deal to the one already rejected three times by Parliament. I'm pretty sure Guy Voerhofstedt will throw a huge leaving party for Farage when this is all over.
The only way you'll get Brexit now is by accepting Labour's version with a Customs Union and the only way to get that is to swallow your pride and do something that really is in the National Interest.
Click to expand...

I thought in the National Interest we abide by the Nation?
The Customs Union version won’t work I would think.
Does anyone on this forum actually believe that would work???
I don’t mind some compromise and equality to all, but staying in the EU isn’t.
Going to be interesting to see what next the MPs can give us a laugh with.
 
Last edited:
Vixere said:
Hi Chippie - please don't feed either.
Click to expand...
How do you manage to get multiple usernames on here, DA, Allsorts, Vixere.
There was another one you briefly used whilst you apparently couldn't log in under the second account. I can't remember what you called yourself that time.
But, how do you do it?
 
Let's hope Corbyn sticks to his demand for a second vote on any deal.
 
Lets hope all the traitorous mps lose their jobs at the next election.Do they not comprehend that out means out.
 
The leavers don't seem to comprehend that their campaign was corrupt.
 
chippie244 said:
The leavers don't seem to comprehend that their campaign was corrupt.
Click to expand...

They do understand that, but so are they.

Anyhoo, let's hope the EU sticks to its insistence that any extension will take us beyond the date we plan for EU elections.
 
Irony.

We all know what it means, but only one half recognises it. Bizarre, eh?
 
In amongst all the willy waving and finger pointing, i can just about discern the trend is for a 'Leave means Leave; no-deal; no surrender!' Brexit.
 
Harry Stottle said:
Lets get out before the EU boat sinks, preferably without doing any deals with that unelected lot in Brussels.
Click to expand...

They are elected. This is why Brexit has to be finalised, in one form or another, before the May elections to the European Parliament.

I refer the venerable member to post #176.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top